<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Shashank Rana &#187; intelligent search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shashankrana.com/tag/intelligent-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shashankrana.com</link>
	<description>from a wandering mind...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:10:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Search and Wolfram Alpha&#8230; and yes, Bing!</title>
		<link>http://shashankrana.com/2009/06/google-search-and-wolfram-alpha-and-yes-bing/</link>
		<comments>http://shashankrana.com/2009/06/google-search-and-wolfram-alpha-and-yes-bing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shashank</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Gyan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wolfram alpha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shashank.asia/2009/06/google-search-and-wolfram-alpha-and-yes-bing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks as if after the browser war with the entry of Chrome and Opera 10, there is some action in the intelligent search market. ‘Search’ on Internet has been dominated by Google, despite the fact that Search Engine Optimization has killed the logic of intelligent search on Google. Having said that, it is true [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">It looks as if after the browser war with the entry of <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Chrome</a> and <a href="http://www.opera.com">Opera 10</a>, there is some action in the <strong>intelligent search </strong>market. ‘Search’ on Internet has been dominated by Google, despite the fact that <strong>Search Engine Optimization </strong>has killed the logic of intelligent search on Google. </p>
<p align="justify">Having said that, it is true that Google is and will rule the Search Engine market for a long time to come. For a search query like “<strong>brief history of Jaipur</strong>”, <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=brief+history+of+jaipur" target="_blank">Google</a> has about half a million results while <a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=brief+history+of+jaipur" target="_blank">Bing</a> only produced about sixty thousand. What’s funny about Bing is that the first result was from something completely irrelevant to the search term. It gave a website from a school that has a hostel named as Jaipur House! This query did not produce any result on <a href="http://www.google.com/squared" target="_blank">Google Squared</a> or <a href="http://www.wolframalpha.com" target="_blank">Wolfram Alpha</a>.</p>
<p align="justify">I thought of looking for something more intelligent. After all, Internet is supposed to be a place for research and I personally believe that if there is no learning from it, there is no use. I tried to look for the “<strong>distance of sun to moon</strong>”. I think it is different because there may be several websites about distance of sun from earth and moon from earth.</p>
<p align="justify">Google had the first result from Wikipedia, the entry for Moon. It didn&#8217;t give any information about the distance but the third result was from Wiki answers and it was the one I was looking for. Of course this could be better, like Bing. The first result was from Wiki answers and the excerpt was on target. What’s more, I could also place my mouse over the result and see the preview of the website, getting more information about my query. </p>
<p align="justify">Sadly, Google Squared didn’t bring anything out, which made me realize that it is not meant for such queries. The best answer was from <strong>Wolfram Alpha, </strong>the clear winner here! It told me that the Sun was 1.016 AU away from the moon. An AU is an Astronomical Unit and another query told me the meaning of 1.016 AU in KMs, along with the values in Miles, Meters, Minutes (travel at the speed of light), and comparison of the distance with other similar entities. </p>
<p align="justify">This is what I call <strong>intelligent search</strong>! I am looking forward to a great Search Engine, which will help people find information that they can use. Black Hat and White Hat wearers have already spammed Google database and the websites looks more like link directories. <strong>Information is being replaced by Keywords and content by strategy!</strong></p>
<div align="justify">
<div style="padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; float: none; padding-top: 0px" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:d5bb1d86-eb34-4bf5-93d1-d53b4be852b7" class="wlWriterEditableSmartContent">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/google+search" rel="tag">google search</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/wolfram+alpha" rel="tag">wolfram alpha</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/bing" rel="tag">bing</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/intelligent+search" rel="tag">intelligent search</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/Search+Engine+Optimization" rel="tag">Search Engine Optimization</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/SEO" rel="tag">SEO</a></div>
</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://shashankrana.com/2009/06/google-search-and-wolfram-alpha-and-yes-bing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

